Dos interpretaciones ramistas de Hor,. Carm, 3,1, en el humanismo renacentista
Cl. Mignault and Francisco Sánchez de las Brozas, El Brocense, apply the Ramist theory of the analysis in their observations on Hor., Carm., 3,I. On establishing the quaestio, the two humanists reach diferent interpretations, both in the expression and in the concept. C1. Mignault summarizes the con...
Guardado en:
| Autor Principal: | |
|---|---|
| Publicado en: | Faventia N. 14, fasc. 1, 1992, p. 53-62 |
| Tipo de contenido: | Artículo |
| Idioma: | Castellano |
| Publicado: |
1992
|
| ISSN: | 0210-7570 |
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: |
Texto completo |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | Cl. Mignault and Francisco Sánchez de las Brozas, El Brocense, apply the Ramist theory of the analysis in their observations on Hor., Carm., 3,I. On establishing the quaestio, the two humanists reach diferent interpretations, both in the expression and in the concept. C1. Mignault summarizes the content of the poem in sequences which follow one another chronologically and carries ont a religious reading of the text: the serenity of the spirit (animi tranquillitas) is the only means of achieving the uita beata. Francisco Sánchez avoids the Christian reading andproposes a rational interpretation in the manner of syllogism: we must aim at uita tenuis because it is only way of life whichprovides us with a tranquil life (uita tuta). |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0210-7570 |