Acerca de un comentario sobre el rey Wamba (672-680) y la Chronica Naierensis (s.XII)
A remark by Prof. Juan Gil in his historiographical study of the XI-XIII centuries prompted the writing of this paper, which is an attempt to track down the two current traditions about the figure of king Wamba (672-680). One considers him to be a monk who died in Pampliega (Historia de rebus Hispan...
Guardado en:
| Autor Principal: | |
|---|---|
| Publicado en: | Fortunatae: Revista canaria de Filología, Cultura y Humanidades Clásicas N. 9, 1997, p. 215-221 |
| Tipo de contenido: | Artículo |
| Idioma: | Castellano |
| Publicado: |
1997
|
| ISSN: | 1131-6810 |
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: |
Texto completo |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | A remark by Prof. Juan Gil in his historiographical study of the XI-XIII centuries prompted the writing of this paper, which is an attempt to track down the two current traditions about the figure of king Wamba (672-680). One considers him to be a monk who died in Pampliega (Historia de rebus Hispanie, Chronicon Mundi, Crónica de Alfonso III, Primera Crónica General de España); the other, represented by the Chronica Naierensis, believes him to be buried somewhere in the threefold place-name Castella-Valle Monio-ecclesia Sancti Petri. The author concludes that in fact both interpretations refer to the same place, which in one case is known as Pampliega, a village in Burgos, but also as Saint Peter's church, in Pampliega. No contradiction therefore exists between the old tradition and that ofthe Chronica Naierensis. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1131-6810 |